These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
634 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649779)
1. Competence to refuse medical treatment: autonomy vs. paternalism. Annas GJ; Densberger JE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):561-96. PubMed ID: 11649779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices. Fowler M Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment. Sneiderman B Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Living wills in New York: are they valid? Vile SE Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions. Clementino BJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will. Macklin A Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment. Malloy SE Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills. Johnson SH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics. Vitiello M LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes. Burch TJ MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia. Mendelson D Melb Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 19(1):112-52. PubMed ID: 11654112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Where death begins while life continues. King DD; Roberts CE; Jefferson LS; Brody BA South Tex Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 31(1):145-90. PubMed ID: 11651056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The assault on privacy in healthcare decisionmaking. Rich BA Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 11651237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]