These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice. Mathieu D Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences. Shepherd L Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism. Pollitt K Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime? Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy. Steinbock B Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest. Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive responsibilities: rethinking the fetal rights debate. Burtt S Policy Sci; 1994; 27(2-3):179-96. PubMed ID: 11656483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reaffirming a need to reexamine paternal responsibilities to the fetus. Losco J; Shublak M Politics Life Sci; 1994 Aug; 13(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 11654649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Terry J Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations. Tolton C Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lack of consent although informed: fetal neglect. Reece SA; Reece EA Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 11649199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway? Gallagher J Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty. Johnsen D Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]