These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649799)

  • 1. Is there a constitutional right to die?
    Wickett A
    Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
    Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
    Matthews MA
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
    Watson DE
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Dooling RP
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
    Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
    Allsopp ME
    Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
    Sneiderman B
    Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
    Johnson SH
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
    Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where death begins while life continues.
    King DD; Roberts CE; Jefferson LS; Brody BA
    South Tex Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 31(1):145-90. PubMed ID: 11651056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Nancy Cruzan case.
    McCormick RA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
    Franklin C; Weil MH
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
    Rothenberg KH
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Solnick PB
    Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
    Vitiello M
    LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
    Richard SM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
    Clementino BJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.