These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649846)
1. Behind closed doors: the confidentiality of psychotherapeutic records in Medicaid fraud investigations. Bassano PN Pace Law Rev; 1986; 6(3):441-94. PubMed ID: 11649846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Should there be a psychotherapist privilege in military courts-martial? Hayden DL Mil Law Rev; 1989; 123():31-107. PubMed ID: 11660232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Privacy rights in medical records. Cleaver CM Fordham Urban Law J; 1984-1985; 13(1):165-204. PubMed ID: 11650743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy of medical records. Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A drug addict's right to anonymity. DeSabato AA Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The end of privacy. Spinello RA America (NY); 1997 Jan 4-11; 176(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11660341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response. Boyer BB Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts. Cerveny K; Kent MJ Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Private medical records: are they public property? A survey of privacy, confidentiality and privilege. Kmentt KA Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):274-307. PubMed ID: 11653828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accommodating patient rights and computerized mental health systems. Gobert JJ North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Jan; 54(2):153-87. PubMed ID: 11664607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Developments in the law; privileged communications. IV. Medical and counseling privileges. Harv Law Rev; 1985 May; 98(7):1530-55. PubMed ID: 11645572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Studying fraud: is insurance claim information confidential? Holder AR IRB; 1990; 12(4):4. PubMed ID: 11651261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974. Kemp J Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court. Tarr RW Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality? Silver SA Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Equality of rights under the law: state constitutional protection for abortion rights in Maryland and beyond. Forman S Wis Womens Law J; 1991; 6():87-117. PubMed ID: 11656290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law. Michna C Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(2):495-528. PubMed ID: 11659864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]