These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649863)

  • 21. To bear or not to bear: reproductive freedom as an international human right.
    Hernández BE
    Brooklyn J Int Law; 1991; 17(2):309-58. PubMed ID: 11656131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Living with Roe v. Wade.
    McConnell ML
    Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion and the law in 1980.
    Paul EW; Schaap P
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association.
    Ikemoto LC
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The forest and the trees: Roe v. Wade and its critics.
    Heymann PB; Barzelay DE
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 53(4):765-84. PubMed ID: 11663362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
    Tapovatz WE
    St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
    McConnell MW
    Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
    Siegel R
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers.
    Norz F
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Social implications of developing medical knowledge in the field of human reproduction -- a case of ignoring some human rights.
    Thacker AC
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 11653995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
    Hemphill L
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New reproductive technologies and legal reform.
    Roach SL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11650410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
    Scotland AG
    Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERA: equal rights for abortion?
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):29-44. PubMed ID: 11651741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
    Langley DB
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.