731 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649886)
1. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical priority of patients' wishes.
Dickens BM
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Where death begins while life continues.
King DD; Roberts CE; Jefferson LS; Brody BA
South Tex Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 31(1):145-90. PubMed ID: 11651056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
Lieberson A
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
