These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649893)
1. In re Quinlan: one step further. Ek GK Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity. Agrawal A Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law. Jarrett C Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the matter of Claire Conroy. Connery JR Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy. McCormick RA America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Conroy. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Conroy. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1983 Jul; 464():303-15. PubMed ID: 11648239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to die takes a twist. Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):7. PubMed ID: 11645546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Matter of Conroy. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey. Sullivan JF N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die. Zaremba JF Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Weinberg JK Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]