These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649903)
41. A noninstitutional review board comes of age. Herman SS IRB; 1989; 11(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Dilemmas in paying for clinical research: the view from the IRB. Lind SE IRB; 1987; 9(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Proprietary hospital good place for research--Humana official. Zenger GH Am Med News; 1985 Apr; 28(16):28. PubMed ID: 11649597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Nurses' participation in the institutional bioethical debate in The Netherlands. Prevos B; van der Arend A HEC Forum; 1994 Jul; 6(4):235-56. PubMed ID: 10137306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects. Bryant LE John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Research ethical committees. Denham M; Mahler R Lancet; 1983 May; 1(8335):1223. PubMed ID: 11644257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Baby Fae and the media: how the law allows appropriate access. Christakis N; Panner M IRB; 1986; 8(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research. Mastroianni AC Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. How can an IRB avoid the use of obsolete consent forms? Adkinson NF; Starklauf BL; Blake DA IRB; 1983; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11649510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The practice of ethics committees. Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8403):649. PubMed ID: 11644290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Bioethics and law: the second stage: balancing intelligent consent and individual autonomy. Areen JC Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 11659318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The Hastings Center: ethics in the 80s. Callahan De; Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Dec; 11(6):Supplemen1-16. PubMed ID: 11643686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Hospital ethics committees in Portugal. Bandeira R HEC Forum; 1991; 3(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 10116452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Mandate of the Norwegian National Committee for Medical Research Ethics, 16 May 1990. Norway. Ministry of Education and Research Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Oct; No. 62():9. PubMed ID: 11650939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Lack of scrutiny fueled Baby Fae controversy. Russell C Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committees. Hall D IRB; 1988; 10(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Czech central ethics committee at work. Kment M; Haskovcova H Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Oct; No. 92():16-9. PubMed ID: 11652227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Increased review responsibilities for Australian institutional ethics committees. Darvall L IRB; 1995; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 11653062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The ethical tribunal in medicine. Dagi TF Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11661085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]