These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649910)
1. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases. King JC Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent. Santurri EN; Werpehowski W Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The due process of dying. Flick MR Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills. Johnson SH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s. Johnson SH Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die. Zaremba JF Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]