308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649911)
1. Informed consent for the man on the Clapham omnibus: an English cure for "the American disease".
Miller FH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 11649911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why Britain can't afford informed consent.
Schwartz R; Grubb A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Aug; 15(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 4055351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
Wolfgarten A; Khan A
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
Giesen D; Hayes J
Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case.
Tietz GF
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowing when not to treat.
Stoll BA
Baillieres Clin Oncol; 1987 Jul; 1(2):443-56. PubMed ID: 11659086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent, autonomy and the infantilised patient.
Robertshaw P; Thacker R
Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 11659739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
Shultz MM
Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills.
Johnson SH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Must we forgo informed consent to control health care costs? A response to Mark A. Hall.
Appelbaum PS
Milbank Q; 1993; 71(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 11643184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: a German lesson.
Shaw J
Int Comp Law Q; 1986 Oct; 35(4):864-90. PubMed ID: 11659183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk.
Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-determination and moral responsibility.
Dyck AJ
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 11649916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical authority and infanticide.
Malone PA
J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: the law's uneasy compromise with ethical theory.
Weisbard AJ
Neb Law Rev; 1986; 65(4):749-67. PubMed ID: 11658870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
