555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650072)
1. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare.
Bergkamp L
IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulating human gene therapy.
Areen J
West VA Law Rev; 1985; 88(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 11655150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Divided loyalties: an anthology of conflict of interest duties.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Office
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 11654610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses to the Gagnon report and REBs.
Gagnon D;
NCBHR Commun; 1993; 4(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11652886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of human gene therapy in Australia.
Russel S
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 11659358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital failed on human research policy.
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics in evolution.
Huston P
CMAJ; 1996 Aug; 155(4):363. PubMed ID: 11654512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. European guidance on medical research.
Council of Europe. Committee of Ministers
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Mar; No. 56():8-10. PubMed ID: 11650345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans.
Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N
J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Collaborative research involving human subjects: a survey of researchers using international single project assurances.
Wichman A; Smith J; Mills D; Sandler AL
IRB; 1997; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11654738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The bioethics movement and hospital ethics committees.
Fletcher JC
MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):859-94. PubMed ID: 11651208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical experiments and the new law: in vitro fertilisation procedures, embryo experimentation and the law.
Bravender-Coyle P
Law Inst J; 1985; 59(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 12083090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
