These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650112)

  • 1. A response to Dodds and Jones.
    Purdy LM
    Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11650112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surrogacy and autonomy.
    Dodds S; Jones K
    Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11650109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two questions about surrogacy and exploitation.
    Wertheimer A
    Philos Public Aff; 1992; 21(3):211-39. PubMed ID: 11652070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogacy, patriarchy, and contracts.
    Harris GW
    Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 11652078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case against enforcement of surrogacy contracts.
    Field MA
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 11650311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A response to Purdy.
    Dodds S; Jones K
    Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 11650111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?
    Purdy LM
    Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 11650110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is women's labor a commodity?
    Anderson ES
    Philos Public Aff; 1990; 19(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 11651966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive freedom and women's freedom: surrogacy and autonomy.
    Sistare CT
    Philos Forum; 1988; 19(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 16100825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whose surrogate? Surrogacy, ethics, and the law.
    Scutt JA
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 11651375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critique of pregnancy contracts: comments on articles by Hill, Merrick, Shevory, and Woliver.
    Okin SM
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 11650312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feminist perspectives on reproductive technologies: the politics of motherhood.
    Chokr NN
    Technol Soc; 1992; 14(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 11652187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of Professor Field.
    Field MA
    Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 11656634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In defense of enforcement of the surrogate contract: a reply to Field.
    Hill JL
    Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 11656633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers.
    Rush SE
    Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality.
    Shultz MM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wombs for rent, selves for sale?
    Smith DH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():23-36. PubMed ID: 11645611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commodification and commercial surrogacy.
    Arneson RJ
    Philos Public Aff; 1992; 21(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 11651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
    Bayer R
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: policy concerns for women.
    Woliver LR
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11650309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.