273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650115)
21. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives.
Cox SE
N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In the matter of George Clark.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
Bopp J; Avila D
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Privacy and the right to die.
Riga PJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1981; 26(2):89-126. PubMed ID: 11651685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Beth Israel Medical Center.
Thompson L
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11644333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Privacy and personhood revisited: a new framework for substitute decisionmaking for the incompetent, incurably ill adult.
Fentiman LC
George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Mar; 57(4):801-48. PubMed ID: 11651992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Is there a constitutional right to die?
Wickett A
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. All's well that ends well: toward a policy of assisted rational suicide or merely enlightened self determination?
Smith GP
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):275-419. PubMed ID: 11650248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
