443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650137)
1. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
Freamon BK
Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting the right to die: the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Mulholland KC
Harvard J Legis; 1991; 28(2):609-30. PubMed ID: 11651225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New York panel urges widening patients' rights.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Sep; ():A1, B3. PubMed ID: 11646631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
Burch TJ
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices.
Fowler M
Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Competence to refuse medical treatment: autonomy vs. paternalism.
Annas GJ; Densberger JE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):561-96. PubMed ID: 11649779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives.
Cox SE
N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to die: state courts lead where legislatures fear to tread.
Hoefler JM; Kamoie BE
Law Policy; 1992 Oct; 14(4):337-80. PubMed ID: 11652673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
