These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650138)

  • 21. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
    Capron AM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of in vitro fertilization: is there a right to bear or beget a child by any available medical means?
    Eccles MR
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):1033-57. PubMed ID: 11655769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Asexual reproduction and genetic engineering: a constitutional assessment of the technology of cloning.
    Pizzulli F
    South Calif Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 47(2):476-584. PubMed ID: 11660870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
    Ellis DA
    Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Legislative regulation of surrogacy and reproductive technology.
    Shultz MM
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 11655178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rumpelstiltskin revisited: the inalienable rights of surrogate mothers.
    Harv Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 99(8):1936-55. PubMed ID: 11655817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP; Iraola R
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
    Massie AM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality.
    Shultz MM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged.
    Raymond JG
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. My body, my life, my baby, my rights.
    Levine R
    Human Rights; 1984; 12(1):27-29, 46-50. PubMed ID: 11649863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation.
    Allen AL
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.