228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650140)
1. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences.
Davis RD
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How far do you trust your colleagues?
Neufeld A
New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
Broad WJ; Wade N
Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Case vignette: inside information.
Kobrick FR; Rodwin MA; VandenBos GR
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 11653081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When good scientists turn bad.
Roman MB
Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
