These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650164)
1. The judge. Rymer R Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1988; 2(3):54-62. PubMed ID: 11650164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Helping the hopelessly ill. Landsman RM Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation. Adams CR; Adams CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment. Sneiderman B Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills. Johnson SH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions. Clementino BJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults. Nelson LJ; Golenski JD Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. Lieberson A Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]