409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650203)
21. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society?
Latourette AW
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
Smith GP; Iraola R
Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Baby-sitting consideration: surrogate mother's right to "rent her womb" for a fee.
Sly KM
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1982-1983; 18(3):539-65. PubMed ID: 11658877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Litigation, legislation, and limelight: obstacles to commercial surrogate mother arrangements.
Tiller SL
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 72(2):415-44. PubMed ID: 11658963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surrogate parenthood: finding a North Carolina solution.
Bartlett KT
North Carol Centr Law J; 1989; 18(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Surrogate motherhood in California: legislative proposals.
van Hoften EL
San Diego Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 18(2):341-85. PubMed ID: 11650645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In defense of surrogate parenting: a critical analysis of the recent Kentucky experience.
Phillips JW; Phillips SD
KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(4):877-931. PubMed ID: 11658606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The surrogate mother contract in Indiana.
Dodd BJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1982; 15(4):807-30. PubMed ID: 11649581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Baby M: catalyst for family law reform?
Wadlington WJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():1-20. PubMed ID: 11645619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Anna J. v. Mark C.: proof of the imminent need for surrogate motherhood regulation.
Smith BP
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(2):493-517. PubMed ID: 11659536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law.
Arnup K
Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals.
Wadlington WJ
Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Babies for sale.
Fox R
Public Interest; 1993; 11():14-40. PubMed ID: 11656370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
Massie AM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The surrogate mother--a growing problem.
Sappideen C
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary.
Davis AD
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Commercial conceptions: a breeding ground for surrogacy.
O'Brien S
North Carol Law Rev; 1986 Nov; 65(1):127-53. PubMed ID: 11658797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
