617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650241)
1. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research involving children: an interpretation of the new regulations.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1983; 5(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can children be enrolled in a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of synthetic growth hormone?
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Jameton A; Graber B; Sears T
IRB; 1989; 11(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11659085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
Horan DJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research with radiation and healthy children: greater than minimal risk.
Freeman WL
IRB; 1994; 16(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11652791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Problems of drug testing in children in the United States.
Yaffe SJ
Pediatr Pharmacol (New York); 1983; 3(3-4):339-48. PubMed ID: 11659147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental consent and family planning research involving minors: case study.
Herceg-Baron R
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Are clinical trials of cell transplantation for Duchenne muscular dystrophy ethical?
Cho MK
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 11652321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Worlds apart.
Chalmers TC; MacDonald MG
Trial; 1975; 11(6):27-28+. PubMed ID: 11662205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning.
Markey K
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Law No. 88-1138 of 20 Dec 1988 on the Protection of Persons Participating in Biomedical Research.
France
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11659174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1990; 12(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11654001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulatory orphans: juvenile prisoners as transvulnerable research subjects.
Reed JG
IRB; 1999; 21(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 11657875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
