657 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650252)
21. Five points and a lament about Range and Cotton's "Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions.
Roberts MC; Buckloh LM
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 11660119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Issues related to the protection of human research participants.
Harrison L
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
Dickens BM
J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Misinformed consent: an enigma in modern social science research.
Shipley T
Ethics Sci Med; 1977; 4(3-4):93-106. PubMed ID: 590256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Success in spite of failure: why IRBs falter in reviewing risks and benefits.
Williams PC
IRB; 1984; 6(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Human experimentation regulations: too little or too much?
FAS Prof Bull; 1975 Feb; 3(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11664436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical issues in nursing research: access to human subjects.
Scott DW
Top Clin Nurs; 1982 Apr; 4(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11649725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Sharing scientific data II: normative issues.
Weil V; Hollander R
IRB; 1990; 12(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical aspects of research involving elderly subjects: are we doing more than we say?
Lane LW; Cassel CK; Bennett W
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):278-85; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 2131082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
Wheeler DL
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Research ethics in applied anthropology.
Marshall PA
IRB; 1992; 14(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do medical student research subjects need special protection?
Christakis N
IRB; 1985; 7(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The speculum bites back: feminists spark an inquiry into the treatment of carcinoma in situ at Auckland's National Women's Hospital.
Rosier P
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 11659299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The investigator's duty not to deceive.
Cupples B; Gochnauer M
IRB; 1985; 7(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A little too much of the Buchenwald touch? Military radiation research at the University of Cincinnati, 1960-1972.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Stubbs C; Mora-Corrasco F
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):63-102. PubMed ID: 11660591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of IRBs on political science research.
Cleary RE
IRB; 1987; 9(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 11652494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
