205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650255)
1. The ethical values that civil law must respect in the field of euthanasia.
Marker RL
Linacre Q; 1989 Aug; 56(3):22-35. PubMed ID: 11650255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Euthanasia: the handwriting on the wall.
Marzen TJ
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11649266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Euthanasia: the new family planning, part I.
Marker RL
Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1987; 11(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Euthanasia: a comparison of the criminal laws of Germany, Switzerland and the United States.
Sayid MD
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):533-62. PubMed ID: 11649614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy.
Cole SS; Shea MS
Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Living will legislation in Colorado: an analysis of the Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act in relation to similar developments in other jurisdictions.
Marsh LA
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1987; 64(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 11652504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right-to-die: state policymaking and the elderly.
Glick HR
J Aging Stud; 1991; 5(3):283-307. PubMed ID: 11652602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The other pro choice - pro life issue: a comparison of euthanasia law in the United States and the Netherlands.
Thomas MS
J Transnatl Law Policy; 1993; 2(1):323-51. PubMed ID: 11652307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artes moriendi: active euthanasia and the art of dying.
Gifford EA
UCLA Law Rev; 1993 Aug; 40(6):1545-85. PubMed ID: 11652717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A right to die? Some medico-legal reflection.
Ognall H
Med Leg J; 1994; 62(Pt. 4):165-79. PubMed ID: 11654337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
Chapman MA
Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The living will: the final expression.
Baker CH
Leg Med Q; 1980; 4(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 11649353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia and the right to die.
Brown RH; Truitt RB
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1976; 3(3):615-42. PubMed ID: 11663003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures.
Herlan ER
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
