These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650348)
1. Should mom be constrained in the best interests of the fetus? King P Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 11650348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost? Manson R; Marolt J Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice. Mathieu D Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest. Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When is a woman's body not her own? According to law, when she's pregnant. Scutt JA Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11651332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection. Phillips M Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy. Johnsen D Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 3667248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy. Steinbock B Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime? Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism. Pollitt K Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict. Hornstra D Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 11656772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]