These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650349)
1. Whose egg is it anyway?: reproductive rights of incarcerated, institutionalized and incompetent women. Stefan S Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):405-56. PubMed ID: 11650349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers. Norz F Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. International protection of women's reproductive rights. Cook RJ N Y Univ J Int Law Polit; 1992; 24(2):645-727. PubMed ID: 11656212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilizing the retarded: constitutional, statutory and policy alternatives. Sherlock RK; Sherlock RD North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):943-83. PubMed ID: 11658718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany. David HP; Fleischhacker J; Höhn C Popul Dev Rev; 1988 Mar; 14(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11655915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism. Menon N Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retarded woman at center of furor has baby. Belkin L N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive rights 1983: an international survey. Isaacs S Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1982-1983 Fall-Winter; 14(2):311-53. PubMed ID: 11658562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Fetal rights" and the new eugenics. Hubbard R Sci People; 1984; 16(2):7-9, 27-29. PubMed ID: 11649544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Debra B.: the best interest standard in court-authorized sterilization of the mentally retarded. Donahue SM Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):209-32. PubMed ID: 11652532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights. Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women. Nsiah-Jefferson L Womens Rights Law Report; 1989; 11(1):15-38. PubMed ID: 11656016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reflections on the legal regulation of behavior modification in institutional settings. Wexler DB Ariz Law Rev; 1975; 17(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 11661214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion in Japan: a feminist critique. Maruyama H Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10():131-60. PubMed ID: 11660313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection of the rights of pregnant women in prisons and detention facilities. McHugh GA New Engl J Prison Law; 1980; 6(2):231-63. PubMed ID: 11655730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution? Murdock CW Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]