These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Termination of medical treatment. Horan DJ Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis. Steinle SJ Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide? Beatty JA Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Advance directives: the United States experience. Cranford RE Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Living wills: working party report. Greaves D J Med Ethics; 1988 Jun; 14(2):105. PubMed ID: 11644317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. New 'wills' allow people to reject prolonging of life in fatal illness. Otten AL Wall St J (East Ed); 1985 Jul; ():35. PubMed ID: 11647353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part II. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Dec; 73(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 11649625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The right to die. Brennan C New Law J; 1993 Jul; 143(6609):1041-2. PubMed ID: 11652271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Durable power of attorney for health care: a better choice. Garraty CM Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11653116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy. Cole SS; Shea MS Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The ethical values that civil law must respect in the field of euthanasia. Marker RL Linacre Q; 1989 Aug; 56(3):22-35. PubMed ID: 11650255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The right-to-die: state policymaking and the elderly. Glick HR J Aging Stud; 1991; 5(3):283-307. PubMed ID: 11652602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Right to die is approved by Assembly in Trenton. King W N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Withholding and withdrawing nutritional support: advance planning for hard choices. Mishkin B Nutr Clin Pract; 1986; 1(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 11649781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]