These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650527)
21. A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects. Candilis PJ; Wesley RW; Wichman A IRB; 1993; 15(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects. Branson R J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Familial coercion to participate in genetic family studies: is there cause for IRB intervention? Parker LS; Lidz CW IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):6-12. PubMed ID: 11652324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Withdrawing data as a substitute for consent. Freedman B; Sieber JE IRB; 1983; 5(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 11649527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The 'costs of deception' revisited: an openly optimistic rejoinder. Baron RA IRB; 1981 Jan; 3(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 11661897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. An IRB's consent form survey. Lewis JH IRB; 1984; 6(4):10. PubMed ID: 11649561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The investigator's duty not to deceive. Cupples B; Gochnauer M IRB; 1985; 7(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The expert surrogate system: a role for the Golden Rule in clinical practice. Mackillop WJ Humane Med; 1988 Nov; 4(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 11650833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions. Range LM; Cotton CR Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 11654170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Are students really human? Observations on institutional ethics committees. Diamond MR; Reidpath DD Aust Psychol; 1994 Jul; 29(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 11653133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Transsexual 'subjects' complain about professor's research methods. Wilson R Chron High Educ; 2003 Jul; 49(46):A10. PubMed ID: 15287129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rate of refusal to participate in clinical trials. Shimm DS; Spece RG IRB; 1992; 14(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Consent to incomplete disclosure as an alternative to deception: case study. Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Dec; 4(10):9-11. PubMed ID: 11651795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S. Gray BH Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use? Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The New Zealand Cot Death Study: some legal and ethical issues. Mitchell EA; Hassall IB; Scragg R; Taylor BJ; Ford R; Allen EM J Paediatr Child Health; 1992; 28 Supp 1():S17-20. PubMed ID: 11686168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The ethics of research involving radiation. Veatch RM IRB; 1982 Jan; 4(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 11650532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Issues related to the protection of human research participants. Harrison L J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]