These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650528)
1. Using patient records for research: the response from federal agencies and the state of Pennsylvania. Hershey N IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response. Boyer BB Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Agency's final rule covers confidentiality in research. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Feb; 11(2):2. PubMed ID: 11654436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A guide to the new federal rules governing the confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records. Helms DJ Contemp Drug Probl; 1975; 4(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 11661264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Privacy rights in medical records. Cleaver CM Fordham Urban Law J; 1984-1985; 13(1):165-204. PubMed ID: 11650743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PRO proposal jeopardizes confidentiality. Am Med News; 1984 Jul; 27(27):4. PubMed ID: 11653592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preventing patient dumping: sharpening the COBRA's fangs. Treiger KI N Y Univ Law Rev; 1987 Dec; 61(6):1186-223. PubMed ID: 11659026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Participant protection with the use of records: ethical issues and recommendations. Leigh WA Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 11660540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Govt. tells birth control clinics: notify teens' parents. Wood AP Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 15-28; 18(4):1, 22-23. PubMed ID: 11653469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Disabled infant's parents win again. Krieger L Am Med News; 1984 Mar; 27(10):2, 28. PubMed ID: 11653558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Brave new world: the privacy threat that didn't go away. Scarf M New Repub; 1999 Jul; 221(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11660734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ; Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities. Wright DE Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law relating to confidentiality of data acquired by researchers in the biomedical and social sciences. Bravender-Coyle P Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1986; 8(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 11650864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court. Tarr RW Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HIV/AIDS confidentiality: are computerized medical records making confidentiality impossible? Cohen JD Softw Law J; 1990 Oct; 4(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 11651049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974. Kemp J Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]