These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner. Garfield H Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision. Lindholm LM Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and judicial review: of burdens and benefits, hard cases and some bad law. Bennett RW Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Feb; 75(6):978-1017. PubMed ID: 11655428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The politics of abortion. Gearty C J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of life: from Roe to Quinlan and beyond. Cincotta J Cathol Lawyer; 1979; 25(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 11664101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld. Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled. Loewy AH North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--a new Constitutional right to an abortion. Watt RL North Carol Law Rev; 1973 Oct; 51(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 11663419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Canadian abortion quagmire: the way in and a way out. Hunter IA Can Fam Law Q; 1990; 6():57-78. PubMed ID: 11656050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Morgentaler and American theories of judicial review: the Roe v. Wade debate in Canadian disguise? Crann GP Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1989; 47(2):499-525. PubMed ID: 11652618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill. Ruf BA Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. byrn and Roe: the threshold question and juridical review. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1978; 23(4):309-31. PubMed ID: 11664059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework. Sterns ML New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]