These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment. Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Philosophical and moral aspects of manipulation and of risk. Sass HM Swiss Biotech; 1987; 5(2a):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology. Wright S Soc Stud Sci; 1986 Nov; 16(4):593-620. PubMed ID: 11650809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The life sciences and the public: is science too important to be left to the scientist? Goggin ML Politics Life Sci; 1984 Aug; 3(1):28-75. PubMed ID: 11649787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Symposium. Biotechnology and the law: recombinant DNA and the control of scientific research. South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):969-1573. PubMed ID: 11661667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recombinant DNA: triumph or Trojan horse? Holtzman E Man Med; 1977; 2(2):83-103, W7. PubMed ID: 12083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Doubts over genetic engineering controls. Wright S New Sci; 1976 Dec; 72(1029):520-1. PubMed ID: 11663697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biotechnology and culture: the impact of public debates on government regulation in the United States and Denmark. Baark E; Jamison A Technol Soc; 1990; 12(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 11650912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic engineering: the moral challenge. Griffin B Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(3):30-9. PubMed ID: 11662387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulation of technological activities: a new approach. Ramo S Science; 1981 Aug; 213(4510):837-42. PubMed ID: 11643656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The ethics of patenting higher life forms. Hoffmaster B Intellect Prop J; 1988; 4():1-24. PubMed ID: 11652586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science, technology, and the limits of judicial competence. Jasanoff S; Nelkin D Science; 1981 Dec; 214(4526):1211-5. PubMed ID: 11643671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research. Chalker SM; Catz RS Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reasonableness versus rationality in the construction and justification of science policy decisions: the case of the Cambridge Experimentation Review Board. Waddell C Sci Technol Human Values; 1989; 14(1):7-25. PubMed ID: 11650830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Recombinant DNA: legal responses to a new biohazard. Balmer TA Environ Law; 1977; 7(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 11661448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]