These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650727)
1. Early management and decision-making for the treatment of myelomeningocele at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: observations clinical and ethical. Allsopp ME Linacre Q; 1986 Feb; 53(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 11650727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Johnson v. Sullivan. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 11644472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies. Hall HB Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die. Kamen A Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Life-and-death lottery in the nursery. Hentoff N Washington Post; 1984 Apr; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On letting some babies die. Smith DH Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The 'mercy' killers. Ross V Macleans; 1983 Nov; 96(47):24-39. PubMed ID: 11658699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Johnson v. Thompson. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 971():1487-99. PubMed ID: 11648605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joining in life and death: on separating the Lakeberg twins. Dougherty CJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11653280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Little murders. Patrick JG New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Life, death and the handicapped newborn: a review of the ethical issues. Higginson R Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11651894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Children with meningomyelocele: some ethical problems of care. Kleinberger H Med Law; 1982; 1(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 11658702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]