These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650759)
1. Depo-provera therapy as an alternative to imprisonment. McFarland L Houst Law Rev; 1986 May; 23(3):801-19. PubMed ID: 11650759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of Depo-provera for treating male sex offenders: a review of the constitutional and medical issues. Rainear DH Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 16(1):181-230. PubMed ID: 11650761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of Depo-Provera in the treatment of sex offenders. The legal issues. Demsky LS J Leg Med; 1984 Jun; 5(2):295-322. PubMed ID: 6235301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemical 'castration' poses moral, legal dilemmas. Mills K Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A7. PubMed ID: 11646452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Texas court agrees to castration for rapist of 13-year-old-girl. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. AIDS and rape: the constitutional dimensions of mandatory testing of sex offenders. Moody DK Cornell Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 76(1):238-67. PubMed ID: 11652590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Depo-Provera may deter violence, but some MDs question ethics. Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):10. PubMed ID: 11645496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to refuse mental health treatment: a First Amendment perspective. Winick BJ Univ Miami Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 44(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11659280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Forced administration of sex-drive reducing medications to sex offenders: treatment or punishment? Miller RD Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998; 4(1-2):175-99. PubMed ID: 12484316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation. Burke M Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Giving sex offenders drug spurs concerns. Engel M Washington Post; 1983 Jul; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11646374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The prisoner and the psychiatrist. Forer LG Emory Law J; 1982; 31(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 11658404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Norplant: the new scarlet letter? Flannery MT J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cruel and unusual therapy. Will GF Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11646155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Of mad dogs and scientists: the perils of the "criminal-insane". Burt RA Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Dec; 123(2):258-96. PubMed ID: 11664340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. First negligence action against Mental Health Act Commission. Dyer C BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1296-7. PubMed ID: 11642808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sexual suppressants and the Mental Health Act. Fennell P Crim Law Rev; 1988 Oct; 1988():660-76. PubMed ID: 11659133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Amid controversy, castration plan in Texas rape case collapses. Suro R N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics committee opinion approved -- involuntary drug treatment of sex offenders. Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999 Jan; 24(1):19. PubMed ID: 12484309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]