182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650764)
1. Surgery and the rights of children with handicaps.
Kugel RB
N Y Med Q; 1985; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11650764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. If not that way, what way?
America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who should make medical decisions?
Genel M
Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
Sarno JJ
Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Lawsuit challenges 'Baby Doe' regulation.
Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
Jolly CM
West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Jane Doe.
America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting handicapped infants.
Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
Born MA
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
