These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650779)

  • 1. Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: a proposed explication.
    Freedman B
    IRB; 1987; 9(6):7-10. PubMed ID: 11650779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuing IRB review when research activity is limited to routine follow-up evaluations.
    Amdur RJ; Bankert E
    IRB; 1997; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11654739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
    Herch F; Flower R
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects.
    Bloom MJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
    Ratnoff MF
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
    Freedman B
    IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuing review of research involving human subjects: approach to the problem and remaining areas of concern.
    Gordon B; Prentice E
    IRB; 1997; 19(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11655323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
    Branson R
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Half-full or half-empty? Evaluating IRB performance.
    Mishkin B; Ariand N
    Prof Ethics Rep; 1998; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11657925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Issues related to the protection of human research participants.
    Harrison L
    J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased review responsibilities for Australian institutional ethics committees.
    Darvall L
    IRB; 1995; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 11653062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The history of institutional review boards.
    Sherman M; Van Vleet JD
    Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.