317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650898)
1. Source compensation for tissues and cells used in biotechnical research: why a source shouldn't share in the profits.
Dillon TP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(4):628-45. PubMed ID: 11650898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
Hardiman R
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cells, sales, and royalties: the patient's right to a portion of the profits.
Danforth MT
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):179-202. PubMed ID: 11650242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.
Murray TH
IRB; 1986; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tissue transplants: the dilemma of the body's growing value.
Thorne ED
Public Interest; 1990; No. 98():37-48. PubMed ID: 11650342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Profiting from patient tissue: can patients lay claim to profits from products derived from their tissues?
Med World News; 1985 Jun; 26(11):63. PubMed ID: 11645555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1986; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue.
Field NE
Yale Law J; 1989 Oct; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
O'Connor JJ
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(1):115-69. PubMed ID: 11659354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal tissue transplantation: regulating the medical hope for the future.
Sedlak JF
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 11659312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The sale of human organs: implicating a privacy right.
Johnson KL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 21(3):741-62. PubMed ID: 11649985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antitrust problems and solutions to meet the demand for transplantable organs.
Hawley CK
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1991; 1991(4):1101-33. PubMed ID: 11652235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
Howard JJ
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Living cells enter commerce; now, who has a claim to profits?
Pollack A
N Y Times Web; 1990 Aug; ():E6. PubMed ID: 11646781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does it matter whether there is public policy for presumed consent in organ transplantation?
Sipes DD
Whittier Law Rev; 1991; 12(4):505-35. PubMed ID: 11651390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human tissue: rights in the body and its parts.
Dworkin G; Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(3):291-319. PubMed ID: 11656860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine.
Hicks SC
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
