These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11650943)

  • 1. Bailment and donation of parts of the human body.
    Brahams D
    New Law J; 1989 Jun; 139(6411):803-4. PubMed ID: 11650943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
    Howard JJ
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cells for sale.
    Stone J
    Discover; 1988 Aug; 9(8):33-9. PubMed ID: 11650025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
    Martin PA; Lagod ML
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public policy symposium: the legal, ethical, and economic impact of patient material used for product development in the biomedical industry.
    Royston I; Wagner AB; Caplan AL; Rosenberg LE
    Clin Res; 1985 Oct; 33(4):442-58. PubMed ID: 11643828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
    O'Connor JJ
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(1):115-69. PubMed ID: 11659354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.
    Prowda JB
    J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1995 Aug; 77(8):611-39. PubMed ID: 11658094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
    Potts J
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    Healey JM; Dowling KL
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):989-1005. PubMed ID: 11651440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ruling renews fears of limits on research.
    Reinhold R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():19. PubMed ID: 11646695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human tissue: rights in the body and its parts.
    Dworkin G; Kennedy I
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(3):291-319. PubMed ID: 11656860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second thoughts about U.S. Patent #4,438,032.
    Burrows B
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():11-4. PubMed ID: 11655049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
    Hardiman R
    UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maintaining incentives for bioprospecting: the occasional need for a right to lie.
    Heidt R
    Berkeley Technol Law J; 1998; 13(2):667-720. PubMed ID: 11979599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: extending the doctrine of informed consent.
    Perley SN
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 May; 67(2):335-65. PubMed ID: 11659626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profiting from patient tissue: can patients lay claim to profits from products derived from their tissues?
    Med World News; 1985 Jun; 26(11):63. PubMed ID: 11645555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1986; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1988 Jul; 249():494-540. PubMed ID: 11648571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Seattle man vents his spleen against those who would use it for profit.
    Carlson P; Pilcher J
    People (Chicago); 1985 Sep; 23(13):97, 100. PubMed ID: 11653641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Source compensation for tissues and cells used in biotechnical research: why a source shouldn't share in the profits.
    Dillon TP
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(4):628-45. PubMed ID: 11650898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.