These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651024)
1. Changing Roman Catholic attitudes toward termination of life-sustaining treatments. Hill TP Linacre Q; 1991 May; 58(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 11651024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does right to privacy include right to die? Court to decide. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia. Grant ER; Cleaver CA Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nancy Cruzan case. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law. Jarrett C Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying. Feenan D Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J; Avila D Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutionalizing the "right to die". Mayo TW MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die at the end of your life. Belgum D J Relig Health; 1990; 29(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 11651995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Weinberg JK Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan. Hoffmann DE Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]