These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651050)
1. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests. Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA identification systems: social policy and civil liberties concerns. Bereano PL J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 11651004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy. Burk DL Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy? Yee YH Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information. Dash JF J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy. Doot GM Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A legal research agenda for the Human Genome Initiative. Karjala DS Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):121-222. PubMed ID: 11659417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool? Hibbert M Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause. Cavoli JG Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic tests: can we afford the answers? Zoler ML Med World News; 1991 Jan; 32(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 11653931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Human Genome Project: bibliography of ethical, social, legal, and scientific aspects. Arizona State University Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(2):223-311. PubMed ID: 11659418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics. Goldberg C N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy. Shapiro ED; Weinberg ML Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(3):455-86. PubMed ID: 11651144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The precarious implications of DNA profiling. Smith JC Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjudicating neurogenetics at the crossroads: privacy, adoption, and the death sentence. Zweig FM; Walsh JT; Freeman DM Judges J; 1997; 36(3):52-55, 57-58, 90-93. PubMed ID: 11656824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]