These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651097)
1. Of father born: a lesbian feminist critique of the Ontario Law Reform Commission recommendations on artificial insemination. Coffey MA Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):424-33. PubMed ID: 11651097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns. Kanno N Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to procreate: when rights claims have gone wrong. Shanner L McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):823-74. PubMed ID: 11654471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnant couples: medical technology and social constructions around fertility and reproduction. Kirejczyk M; Van Der Ploeg I Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 11653994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The birth of a feminist sperm bank: new social agendas for AID. Bermel J Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11643984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion in Japan: a feminist critique. Maruyama H Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10():131-60. PubMed ID: 11660313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive ethics: feminist and non-feminist approaches. Overall C Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 11651092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism. Brandel A MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human artificial insemination and the law in Australia. De Stoop DF Aust Law J; 1976 Jun; 50(6):298-308. PubMed ID: 11664730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe? Varela MJ; Stolcke V Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human-semen banking: social and public policy issues. Frankel MS Man Med; 1976; 1(4):289-310. PubMed ID: 12083127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Off the pedestal and onto the block? Motherhood, reproductive technologies, and the Canadian state. Brodribb S Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):407-23. PubMed ID: 11651096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public policies and reproductive technology: a feminist critique. Mccormack T Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():105-24. PubMed ID: 12317572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale. National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada) Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism. Menon N Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion laws and the abortion situation in India. Karkal M Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11651217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]