These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651099)
1. Reproductive technology and the rights of disabled persons. Tait JJ Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):446-55. PubMed ID: 11651099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale. National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada) Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns. Kanno N Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women. Nsiah-Jefferson L Womens Rights Law Report; 1989; 11(1):15-38. PubMed ID: 11656016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Feminist framework on reproductive technology declaration. International Women and Health Meeting (6th: 1990: Manila) Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 11651372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The embryo as a legal entity -- woman as a fetal environment: the new German laws on reproductive engineering and embryo research. Waldschmidt A Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11651216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technology and disability: searching for the "rights" and "wrongs" in explanation. Mosoff J Dalhous Law J; 1993; 16():98-124. PubMed ID: 11659939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnant couples: medical technology and social constructions around fertility and reproduction. Kirejczyk M; Van Der Ploeg I Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 11653994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Destructuring disability: rationing of health care and unfair discrimination against the sick. Orentlicher D Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1996; 31(1):49-87. PubMed ID: 11660333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Of father born: a lesbian feminist critique of the Ontario Law Reform Commission recommendations on artificial insemination. Coffey MA Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):424-33. PubMed ID: 11651097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-tube babies: solution or problem? Hubbard R Technol Rev; 1980; 82(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11650652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening in or out of the new reproductive options: who decides and why. Leiblum SR; Williams E J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Dec; 14(Spec. Iss):37-44. PubMed ID: 11659953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health care rationing and disability rights. Peters PG Indiana Law J; 1995; 70(2):491-547. PubMed ID: 11660218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abuse by medical practice? Clinical reinforcement of negative cultural norms. Shanner L Monash Bioeth Rev; 1995 Jan; 14(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 11660083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Access to in vitro fertilization: costs, care and consent. Overall C Dialogue Can Philos Assoc; 1991; 30(3):383-97. PubMed ID: 11660000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Held to a higher standard. Nelson HL Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 11642896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Teaching feminist perspectives on health care ethics and law: a review essay. Bender L Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1993; 61(4):1251-76. PubMed ID: 11656277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ontario's decision to defund in vitro fertilization treatment except for women with bilateral fallopian tube damage. Ikonomidis S; Dickens B Can Public Policy; 1995 Sep; 21(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11660295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]