These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Whose consensus is it? The feminist challenge to Cairo. Reist MT Hum Life Rev; 1995; 21(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11653008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Pregnancy as a disability. Hodgson EE Health Law J; 1993; 1():119-45. PubMed ID: 10569852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A public philosophy of assisted reproduction for New York State. Nelson JL Med Humanit Rev; 1999; 13(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 11660753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. What is the relevance of women's sexual and reproductive rights to the practising obstetrician/gynaecologist? Shaw D; Faúndes A Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 16563873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Not all that glitters is gold. Rothman BK Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4 Suppl):S11-5. PubMed ID: 11652051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Women's perceptions and practices regarding their rights to reproductive health. Abou Shabana K; el-Shiek M; el-Nazer M; Samir N East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 15751922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Human growth hormone: a case study in treatment priorities. Tauer CA Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 11654186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The return of eugenics. Neuhaus RJ Commentary; 1988 Apr; 85(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 11658993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Advocacy for legal reform for safe abortion. Ashenafi M Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15487618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond. Phillips CA Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. More thoughts on the physician's constitutional role in abortion and related choices. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 11659171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Older women, pregnancy, and postmodernism: the irrationality of saying no to 60-something women. Clements C Free Inq; 1999; 19(4):35-6. PubMed ID: 11657870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe? Varela MJ; Stolcke V Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. "O wind, remind him that I have no child": infertility and feminist jurisprudence. Lacey LJ Mich J Gend Law; 1998-1999; 5(1):163-203. PubMed ID: 16596756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]