337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651138)
1. Access to animal care committees.
Francione GL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1990; 43(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulation of animal experimentation: United States of America.
Orlans FB
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):138-52. PubMed ID: 11649993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The constitutional status of restrictions on experiments involving nonhuman animals: a comment on Professor Dresser's analysis.
Francione GL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):797-818. PubMed ID: 11650812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Out from under the microscope: a case for laboratory animal rights.
Subar LM
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1987; 1987(2):511-46. PubMed ID: 11659079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing harm and justification in animal research: federal policy opens the laboratory door.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):723-95. PubMed ID: 11650811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Improved Standards for Laboratory Animals Act: will it ensure that the policy of the Animal Welfare Act becomes a reality?
Dukes EF
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):519-42. PubMed ID: 11650841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Animal advisors forced into the open.
Kleiner K
New Sci; 1997 Jan; 153(2066):9. PubMed ID: 11656576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal experimentation: issues for the 1980s.
Zola JC; Sechzer JA; Sieber JE; Griffin A
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(2):40-50. PubMed ID: 11650677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal rights and wrongs.
Stryker J
Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The secret world of animal experiments.
Hampson J
New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1816):24-7. PubMed ID: 11656118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Creating a private cause of action against abusive animal research.
McDonald KL
Univ PA Law Rev; 1986; 134(2):399-432. PubMed ID: 11649857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The law of institutional review boards.
Robertson JA
UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 26(3):484-549. PubMed ID: 11661806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are smelly animals happy animals?: competing definitions of laboratory animal cruelty and public policy.
Groves JM
Soc Anim; 1994; 2(2):125-44. PubMed ID: 11654357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving standards for laboratory animals.
Brown GE
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 May; 130(70):E2453-6. PubMed ID: 11658688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Animal experiments the American way.
Gavaghan H
New Sci; 1992 May; 134(1821):32-6. PubMed ID: 11656146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional animal care and use committees: a flawed paradigm or work in progress?
Gluck JP; Orlans FB
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 11655338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fight over animal experiments gains intensity on many fronts.
Eckholm E
N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
