These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651168)
1. Polish physicians and the end of life. Kujawa E; Derczynski W Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; No. 69():13-6. PubMed ID: 11651168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Euthanasia: the physician's liability. Thurman V John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 10(1):148-72. PubMed ID: 11661425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The law and death--an overview. Stephan LD; Billings MN J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11662357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act. Flannery EJ Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Euthanasia: the new family planning, part II. Marker RL Int Rev Nat Fam Plann; 1987; 11(2):95-131. PubMed ID: 11649868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk taking by physicians in legally gray areas. Quill TE Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):693-708. PubMed ID: 11652861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to die. Logan P Month; 1976 Jun; 9(6):199-202. PubMed ID: 11661306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Some religious views on the right to die. Washington Post; 1997 Jun; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11648052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal aspects of medical euthanasia. Meyers DW Bioscience; 1973 Aug; 23(8):467-70. PubMed ID: 11660863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Right to Die: Public Health Trust v. Wons -- Florida moves away from Massachusetts and New Jersey toward California and Mississippi despite Cruzan v. Harmon. Gordon DR N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):40-98. PubMed ID: 11652593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Active vs. passive euthanasia: why keep the distinction? Kamisar Y Trial; 1993 Mar; 29(3):32-34, 36-38. PubMed ID: 11652688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical problems in living will legislation. Hughes R J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A time to live, a time to die: advance directives and living wills. Mitchell CB; Whitehead MK Ethics Med; 1993; 9(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A gentle and easy death: from ancient Greece to beyond Cruzan toward a reasoned legal response to the societal dilemma of euthanasia. Messinger TJ Denver Univ Law Rev; 1993; 71(1):175-251. PubMed ID: 11652682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives. Zinberg JM Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing the good death. Sage W Hum Behav; 1974 Jun; 3(6):16+. PubMed ID: 11662943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician-assisted lethal injection vs. the plastic bag: will euthanasia legislation ever come? A comparison of standards in the Netherlands and the United States. Joas UA Temple Int Comp Law J; 1992; 6(2):365-401. PubMed ID: 11660113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]