1052 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651208)
1. The bioethics movement and hospital ethics committees.
Fletcher JC
MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):859-94. PubMed ID: 11651208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
Mastroianni AC
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulating ethics committees in health care institutions -- is it time?
Hoffman D
MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):746-97. PubMed ID: 11651206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare.
Bergkamp L
IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should there be governmental guidelines in bioethics? The French approach.
Labrusse-Riou C
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1989; 12(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11659185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Bioethics Commission meets, outlines agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Nov; 14(11):1533. PubMed ID: 11644890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Groups set up panel on use of fetal tissue.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward maintaining ethical research on violent behavior.
Eichelman B
Clin Res; 1976 Dec; 24(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 11661369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical ethics.
Walters L
JAMA; 1985 Oct; 254(16):2345-8. PubMed ID: 11643821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 11642833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethicists are a new source of second opinions.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():E24. PubMed ID: 11646170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator.
Wielk CA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conference report on S. 540, a bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and for other purposes.
Dingell JD
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 Oct; 130(131):H11339-60. PubMed ID: 11658583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Spain: from the decree to the proposal.
Gracia D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S29-31. PubMed ID: 11644028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethics and public policy in Australia.
Gillam L
Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 11654825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An egg takes flight: the once and future life of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Capron AM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 11654623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
