These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651258)
1. "An unfortunate experiment": the New Zealand study of cancer of the cervix. Flagler EA; Winkler ER Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Apr; 25(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 11651258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The speculum bites back: feminists spark an inquiry into the treatment of carcinoma in situ at Auckland's National Women's Hospital. Rosier P Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 11659299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NZ medicine after Cartwright. Gillett G BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6729):892-4. PubMed ID: 11642768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A report from New Zealand: an "unfortunate experiment. Campbell AV Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 11650114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The aftermath of the cervical cancer inquiry in New Zealand: an antipodal aberration or universal struggle? Munro K Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11651368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intent in law and medicine. Gillett GR N Z Law J; 1991 Apr; ():115-21. PubMed ID: 11659548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Power and responsibility in the practice of medicine. Campbell AV; Tschudin V Stud Christ Ethics; 1989; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 16127842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Zealand smear trial risked lives. Lowry S BMJ; 1988 Aug 20-27; 297(6647):507-8. PubMed ID: 11644476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New Zealand: upheavals in medical research. Coney S Lancet; 1989 Dec; 2(8677):1445. PubMed ID: 11644440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An unfortunate experiment? The future of ethical review in New Zealand. McMillan J; Bowyer L Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Jul; 23(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 24866915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The implications for Australia of the New Zealand report of the cervical cancer inquiry: no cause for complacency. McNeill PM Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):264-8, 271. PubMed ID: 2716624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The New Zealand cervical cancer study: could it happen again? Paul C BMJ; 1988 Aug 20-27; 297(6647):533-9. PubMed ID: 3139190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical ethics in the dock. N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human experimentation and human rights. Katz J St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz. Pellegrino ED St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New Zealand: patient advocate at Auckland's National Women's Hospital. Coney S Lancet; 1989 Oct; 2(8668):911-2. PubMed ID: 11644434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical research after Auckland. Gerber P; Coppleson M Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 2716616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995. National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada) NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]