236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651270)
1. Better safe than sorry.
Faulder C
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():29-33. PubMed ID: 11651270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tamoxifen and informed consent/dissent.
Raloff J
Sci News; 1992 Nov; 142(22):378-80. PubMed ID: 11659541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. MRC to go ahead with controversial tamoxifen trial.
Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Oct; No. 72():3-5. PubMed ID: 11659455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tamoxifen turmoil: new issues emerge as healthy women volunteer to take a potent drug.
Raloff J
Sci News; 1994 Oct; 146(17):268-9. PubMed ID: 11659906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical Research Council multi-centre trial of orchiectomy in carcinoma of the prostate; a follow-up: MRC trial of orchiectomy in carcinoma of the prostate.
Nicholson RH
IRB; 1986; 8(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11653765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethical approach to randomization in oncology.
Arpaillange P; Dion S
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1986; 12(1-2-3):99-103. PubMed ID: 11650154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients' rights in research.
Warden J
BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1498. PubMed ID: 11642958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRB review of a Phase II randomized clinical trial involving incompetent patients suffering from severe closed head injury.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Leibrock LG; Kelso TK; Sears TD
IRB; 1993; 15(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 11659703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics of drug experimentation.
Sgreccia E
Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):60-75. PubMed ID: 11653200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Community-based AIDS research.
Merton V
Eval Rev; 1990 Oct; 14(5):502-37. PubMed ID: 11656281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical review of clinical research.
Williams J
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Nov; No. 93():28-30. PubMed ID: 11659714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-funded research: paying the piper or protecting the patient?
Morreim EH
IRB; 1991; 13(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 11651046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whose interests: patient's or researcher's?
Thornton H
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Nov; No. 93():13-9. PubMed ID: 11659712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research on healthy volunteers: a report of the Royal College of Physicians.
Royal College of Physicians
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1986 Oct; 20(4):3-17. PubMed ID: 11643937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is informed consent essential for all chemotherapy studies?
Tobias JS; Houghton J
Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 11644622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
