These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651271)

  • 1. Limiting Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The retreat from Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Mod Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 55(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 16977738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical treatment of children.
    Kerr G
    North Irel Leg Q; 1984; 35(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11658590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal
    Wkly Law Rep; 1991 Jul; 1991 Oct 25():592-608. PubMed ID: 12041269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of children in making health care decisions: a comparative approach.
    Broyde CS
    Natl Jew Law Rev; 1987; 2():123-35. PubMed ID: 11658826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Keyholders and flak jackets: consent to medical treatment for children.
    Nicholls M
    Family Law; 1994 Feb; 24():81-5. PubMed ID: 11660606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refusal of treatment: competent child and parents -- Houston, Applicant.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 11655269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The underage girl: a surprising judgment.
    Slack K
    Christ Century; 1985 Nov; 102(36):1054-6. PubMed ID: 11658599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Guardianship of Ingram.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 11644500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment and minors: issues not involving lifesaving treatment.
    King PA
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):241-65. PubMed ID: 11658744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sterilisation and the courts.
    Grubb A; Pearl D
    Camb Law J; 1987 Nov; 46(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 11659062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
    Baron CH
    Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the patient's competence to consent to medical treatment.
    Jones MA; Keywood K
    Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):107-47. PubMed ID: 11657548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.