164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651294)
1. Decisions near the end of life: resource allocation implications for hospitals.
Hofmann PB
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11651294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Futility guidelines: a resource for decisions about withholding and withdrawing treatment.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VACO [VA Central Office] Bioethics Committee. Subcommittee on Futility (Chairperson: Dorothy Rasinski Gregory)
NCCE News; 1994; 2(3 insert):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Orchestrating a dignified death in the intensive-care unit.
Youngner SJ
Clin Chem; 1990 Aug; 36(8 Part B):1617-22. PubMed ID: 11652733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
Weber LJ
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment.
Mead AP
Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care.
Franklin C; Weil MH
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: implications for policy in 1985.
Cassel CK
Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11651801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death by directive.
Alexander GJ
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1988; 28(1):67-103. PubMed ID: 11659027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical and legal issues in intensive care.
Paris JJ; Muir JC; Reardon FE
J Intensive Care Med; 1997; 12(6):298-309. PubMed ID: 11655319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care.
Dorff EN
Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Considerations regarding withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Midwest Bioethics Center. Kansas City Area Ethics Committee Consortium
Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(2):SS1-8. PubMed ID: 11657173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Practical guidelines for action regarding application of CPR/DNR.
Fields FR; McKenna JT
Death Stud; 1988; 12(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 11650091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prolonging life: the new dilemma. Doctors ask, who lives? When to die?
Kleiman D
N Y Times Web; 1985 Jan; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' rights and doctors' responsibilities: confluence and conflict.
Jessop DS
Med Law Int; 1998; 3(2-3):197-208. PubMed ID: 11657595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withholding and withdrawing life support.
Raffin TA
Hosp Pract; 1991 Mar; 26(3):133-136, 140-141, 145. PubMed ID: 11652589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolonging life: the new dilemma. Hospital care of the dying: each day, painful choices.
Kleiman D
N Y Times Web; 1985 Jan; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Case of no consent: the DNR order as a medical decision.
Beatty CD
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):699-727. PubMed ID: 11658986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
