These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment. Sneiderman B Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical priority of patients' wishes. Dickens BM Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Malette v. Shulman: the requirement of consent in medical emergencies. Siebrasse N McGill Law J; 1989; 34(4):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11659256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Annas GJ; Glantz LH Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compulsory medical treatment of adults. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A time to live, a time to die: advance directives and living wills. Mitchell CB; Whitehead MK Ethics Med; 1993; 9(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Malette v. Shulman. Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court, Court of Appeal Dom Law Rep; 1990 Mar; 67():321-39. PubMed ID: 12041075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act. Flannery EJ Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child. Wadlington W Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Living wills in New York: are they valid? Vile SE Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Christian thinking about advance medical directives. Meilaender G Christ Century; 1996 Sep 11-18; 113(26):854-7. PubMed ID: 11654836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Active euthanasia: can it be justified? Molenda FA Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]