269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651336)
1. Report on Australian national conference: "Surrogacy -- In Whose Interest?", Melbourne, February 1991.
Salomone J
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11651336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy.
Ewing C; Rowland R
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 11650919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogacy, patriarchy, and contracts.
Harris GW
Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 11652078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Whose surrogate? Surrogacy, ethics, and the law.
Scutt JA
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 11651375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology and the family.
Robertson JA
Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Liberty and assisted reproduction.
Robertson JA
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogacy: for love but not for money?
Anleu SR
Gend Soc; 1992 Mar; 6(1):30-48. PubMed ID: 11659538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is women's labor a commodity?
Anderson ES
Philos Public Aff; 1990; 19(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 11651966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies.
Thom M
Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critique of pregnancy contracts: comments on articles by Hill, Merrick, Shevory, and Woliver.
Okin SM
Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 11650312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged.
Raymond JG
Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The surrogate mother--a growing problem.
Sappideen C
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate gestator: a new and honorable profession.
Ingram JD
Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76(4):675-99. PubMed ID: 11656585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation.
Robertson JA
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality.
Shultz MM
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):297-398. PubMed ID: 11652059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
Brandel A
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives.
Mies M
Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
