148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651340)
1. Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: theory and the evolution of living will laws.
Glick HR; Hays SP
J Polit; 1991 Aug; 53(3):835-49. PubMed ID: 11651340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance directives: the United States experience.
Cranford RE
Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovative legislative initiatives: the New Jersey Declaration of Death and Advance Directives for Health Care Acts.
Armstrong PW; Olick RS
Seton Hall Legis J; 1992; 16(1):177-97. PubMed ID: 11653079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age.
Halva-Neubauer G
Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The phenomenon of antique laws: can a state revive old abortion laws in a new era?
Plave EF
George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 58(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11656013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
Born MA
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
Burt RA
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. You shall be as gods.
Powledge TM
Worldview; 1977 Sep; 20(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 11661489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and political compromise.
Wolfe C
First Things; 1992; 24():22-9. PubMed ID: 11656165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Amendments to Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Public Law 98-457.
United States
US Statut Large; 1984; 98(Title I Sections 101a-312a):. PubMed ID: 11686171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maryland Assembly ends 'living will' dispute.
McQueen M
Washington Post; 1985 Apr; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11646412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion -- impact on public health.
Malkasian GD
State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The economics and politics of emergency health care for the poor: the patient dumping dilemma.
Hylton MO
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1992; 1992(4):971-1033. PubMed ID: 11656274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HIV infection among women and children and antidiscrimination laws: an overview.
Gittler J; Rennert S
Iowa Law Rev; 1992 May; 77(4):1313-88. PubMed ID: 11653372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
