275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11651345)
1. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
Baldwin ML
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
Jipping TL
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
Eller TR
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
Law SA
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The viability of the trimester approach.
Calder KA
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Counseling, consulting, and consent: abortion and the doctor-patient relationship.
Wood MA; Durham WC
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(4):783-845. PubMed ID: 11664994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
Casurella JG; Schrock CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent and abortion.
Kapp MB
Wis L Rev; 1993; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
Berg P
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The abortion cases.
Rust ME
ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome?
Trense CF
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
